Talk:Kizzycocoa
More actions
Concerning Recent Edit Warring On This Page
Under the guidance of wikipedia's edit warring guideline https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_warring (as we have no native analogue), the staff have reached a decision.
Endless back-and-forth reversions are not remotely constructive, and are in fact a significant barier to regular wiki functions.
Whereas constructive editing sometimes involves a sort of give-and-take, all-out back-and-forth reversions benefit nobody. The circular argument of 'yes it is' vs 'no it isn't' tends to not benefit anyone, as I am sure all can agree. It also generates more animosity which makes consensus still more difficult to achieve.
All that being said, we've examined the edit in question thoroughly, and will for now be reverting the page to its previous state while this is ironed out. We recognize this is a bit of a band-aid fix, but simply facilitating communication on its own has not been enough to stop reversion warring.
Most of the contents also appear to be outside of wiki scope (such as references to Xi Xinping & John Cena, as well as Fatman69 (what am I writing here?????), etc). In light of this reasoning, we're temporarily reverting the page to status quo. This does not in any way mean further editing concerning these topics cannot take place; we encourage the inclusion of 2b-relevant contents in good faith and without undue weight; some sections of said edit satisfy that criteria in our collective views. The majority of this edit appears to not materially pertain to 2b2t, however, leading to our decision.
As far as editing goes, we will be handing out 1-day tempbans for people that continue to edit war (specifically, with edit reversions on this page). Feel free to weigh in on the merits of the page's respective contents and make constructive edits - just don't continue this back-and-forth reversion tug-of-war.
--Joey Coconut1 (talk) 15:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply to Joey Coconut
I do agree that the endless back-and-forth reversions are not constructive. The solution you have implemented is not a good idea. Giving temp bans for people that enter an edit war has the unintended consequence of allowing people to make edits without objection. If someone makes an edit and another reverts it, would they get the temp ban?
Everything Frank has posted, has been very deconstruction to Kizzy. Kizzy makes mistakes and has learning experiences. He is not a bad person but he can express these ideas with a little to much color. I am not against Frank being able to make edits, but I believe Frank's edits have no place here. I'm not sure if Frank actually sees a problem with Kizzy or if frank is trying to demonize him. The ladder is likely the case. Frank probably has some good ideas but he is not objective enough and does not give deep rooted evidence.
I would recommend that people make only small edit for the time being. Also people should not remove things that are a part of Kizzy's identity such as cake. The page is about Kizzy, let him have cake included if he wants.